“Rare Earth Plots” and the
Concentrations of Rare Earth Elements (REE)
in Chondritic Meteorites

Randy L. Korotev

The following sets of concentration values have been used in the geochemical literature for the purpose of preparing plots of “chondrite-normalized” concentrations of REE against atomic number or inverse ionic radius.  Note that the oldest data, columns 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, were obtained from analysis of ordinary chondrites. Thus historically, “chondrite-normalized REE plots” have been based on volatile-free chondrites (Fig. 1).  Columns 5, 7, 11, and 13 represent CI (carbonaceous) chondrites, which contain carbon, water, and other volatile elements, thus the values are systematically lower (Fig. 2). These values are based on more data and are probably more precise and representative than the older OC data.

In my experience, the values of Anders and Grevesse (1989; column 11) consistently give the smoothest "REE patterns" for the wide variety of rock types that we have analyzed in our laboratory.  However, we only obtain data for 7 or 8 of the REE (e.g., Fig. A1 of Korotev, 1996).  To maintain consistency with older literature, I use the values of column 12, which are the CI values of Anders and Grevesse (column 11) multiplied by the factor 1.36.  This factor leads to exactly 0.20 µg/g Sm and values for all REE in the vicinity of those of columns 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6. This approach follows the lead of Boynton (1985; column 8) and Taylor and McClennan (1985; column 9) who chose slightly different normalization factors.

  

Concentration values in µg/g (ppm)
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
  Hask
68/71
Waki 1971 Masu
1973
Naka 1974 Even
1978
Laul 1979 A&E
1982
Boyn 1985
T&M
1985
W&K
1988
A&G
1989
A&G
×1.36
Palm 1988 M&S
1995
OC
OC
OC(L6)
OC
CI
OC
CI
vfCI
vfCI
OC
CI
vfCI
CI
CI
Y 1.96           1.44   2.1 1.8 1.56 2.12 1.57 1.57
La 0.332 0.34 0.378 0.329 0.2446 0.34 0.236 0.310 0.367 0.290 0.2347 0.319 0.245 0.237
Ce 0.876 0.91 0.976 0.865 0.6379 0.85 0.616 0.808 0.957 0.763 0.6032 0.820 0.638 0.613
Pr 0.112 0.121     0.09637 0.12 0.0929 0.122 0.137 0.117 0.0891 0.121 0.0960 0.0928
Nd 0.60 0.64 0.716 0.630 0.4738 0.64 0.457 0.600 0.711 0.572 0.4524 0.615 0.474 0.457
Sm 0.183 0.195 0.230 0.203 0.1540 0.195 0.149 0.195 0.231 0.183 0.1471 0.2000 0.154 0.148
Eu 0.0685 0.073 0.0866 0.0770 0.05802 0.073 0.056 0.0735 0.087 0.069 0.0560 0.0761 0.058 0.0563
Gd 0.252 0.26 0.311 0.276 0.2043 0.26 0.197 0.259 0.306 0.249 0.1966 0.267 0.204 0.199
Tb 0.047 0.047     0.03745 0.047 0.0355 0.0474 0.058 0.043 0.0363 0.0493 0.0370 0.0361
Dy 0.317 0.30 0.390 0.343 0.2541 0.30 0.245 0.322 0.381 0.302 0.2427 0.330 0.254 0.246
Ho 0.070 0.078     0.05670 0.078 0.0547 0.0718 0.0851 0.0693 0.0556 0.0755 0.0570 0.0546
Er 0.201 0.20 0.255 0.225 0.1660 0.20 0.160 0.210 0.249 0.198 0.1589 0.216 0.166 0.160
Tm 0.030 0.032     0.02561 0.032 0.0247 0.0324 0.0356 0.030 0.0242 0.0329 0.0260 0.0247
Yb 0.207 0.22 0.249 0.220 0.1651 0.22 0.159 0.209 0.248 0.200 0.1625 0.221 0.165 0.161
Lu 0.0325 0.034 0.0387 0.0339 0.02539 0.034 0.0245 0.0322 0.0381 0.030 0.0243 0.0330 0.0250 0.0246

REFERENCES and NOTES

1)  Haskin L. A., Wildeman T. R., and Haskin M. A. (1968)
"An accurate procedure for the determination of the rare earths by neutron activation"
Journal of Radioanalytical Chemistry 1, 337-348.

Haskin L. A., Helmke P. A., Paster T. P., and Allen R. O. (1971)
"Rare earths in meteoritic, terrestrial, and lunar matter"
In Activation Analysis in Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry, A. Brunfelt and E. Steinnes, eds., Proc. NATO Conf. on Activation Analysis in Geochemistry, pp. 201-218, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.

Composite of nine (ordinary?) chondrites; error-weighted mean of 1968 and 1971 analyses
2)  Wakita H., Rey P., and Schmitt R. A. (1971)
Elemental abundances of major, minor, and trace elements in Apollo 11 lunar rocks, soil and core samples. Proceedings of the Apollo 11 Lunar Science Conference, 1685-1717.

"composite of 12 chondrites," data in caption to Fig. 1
3)  Masuda A., Nakamura N., and Tanaka T. (1973)
"Fine structure of mutually normalized rare-earth patterns of chondrites"
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 37, 239-248.

"Leedy" (Leedey) chondrite (L6). Note that LL chondrites have high REE concentrations compared to H and L chondrites [Fig. 1, W&K (1988)].
4)  Nakamura N. (1974)
"Determination of REE, Ba, Fe, Mg, Na, and K in carbonaceous and ordinary chondrites"
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 38, 757-775.

Average of ten ordinary chondrites
5)  Evensen N.M., Hamilton P.J., and O'Nions R.K. (1978)
"Rare-earth abundances in chondritic meteorites"
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 42, 1199-1212.

"CI avg.", best estimate of unfractionated chondrites, many literature analyses. The data averaged include data for normalized ordinary chondrites.
6)  Laul J.C. (1979)
"Neutron activation analysis of geologic materials"
Atomic Energy Review 17, 603-695. (Fig. 20 caption, p. 683)

Same as values of Wakita et al. (1971), except for Ce
7)  Anders E. and Ebihara M. (1982)
"Solar-system abundances of the elements"
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 46, 2363-2380.  (Table 6)

Essentially, values of Evensen et al. (1978) divided by 1.0366, except Tb (/1.055)

These values also favored by Wasson J.T. (1985) Meteorites: Their Record of Early Solar-System History, 267 pp., Freeman, New York. (Table D-1) and Wasson and Kallemeyn (1988) "Composition of chondrites," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 325, 535-544.
8)  Boynton W. V. (1985) 
Chapter 3. Cosmochemistry of the rare earth elements: Meteorite studies, In Rare Earth Element Geochemistry (P. Henderson, ed.), (Developments in Geochemistry 2), pp. 115-1522, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Values of Evensen et al. multiplied by 1.267 to be consistent with the average values of Haskin et al. (1968) and Wakita et al. (1972)
9)  Taylor S. R. and McClennan S. M. (1985)
The Continental Crust: Its Composition and Evolution

Blackwell, Oxford. 312 pp. 

Values of Evensen et al. multiplied by 1.5 ["type 1 carbonaceous chondrite (volatile-free: 1.5× original data)"]
These values are are distinctly higher than any of the other "volatile-free" values (Fig. 2).
10) Wasson J. T. and Kallemeyn G. W. (1988)
"Compositions of chondrites"
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 325, 535-544.

I never actually seen these values used; I include them here only for reference. W&K (1988) list means for H, L, and LL chondrites (Fig. 1). It's not clear from the paper what data were averaged. I have averaged their means with a 45.8% H, 39.7% L, and 14.6% LL weighting. These are the relative abundance ratios at this writing for ~32,000 ordinary chondrites listed in the Meteoritical Bulletin Database of the Meteoritical Society. Note that the agreement is good with the original OC data of columns 1 and 2.
11)  Anders E. and Grevesse N. (1989)
"Abundances of the elements: Meteoritic and solar"
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 53, 197-214.

"Mean C1 Chondr." of Table 1
12)  Values of Anders & Grevesse times 1.3596.  

This factor gives Sm = 0.2000 µg/g and results in values for all REE in the vicinity those for the early ordinary chondrite composites.

Some references in which this approach is taken are listed below:

Korotev R. L. (1996) A self-consistent compilation of elemental concentration data for 93 geochemical reference samples. Geostandards Newsletter 20, 217–245.

Korotev R. L. (1996) On the relationship between the Apollo 16 ancient regolith breccias and feldspathic fragmental breccias, and the composition of the prebasin crust in the Central Highlands of the Moon. Meteoritics and Planetary Science 31, 403–412.
13)  Palme. H. (1988)
" Chemical abundances in meteorites"
Reviews in Modern Astronomy (G. Klare, editor), Springer, Berlin pp. 28-51.

These are the author's data for the Orgueil CI chondrite.
14)  McDonough W. F. and Sun S.- s. (1995)
" The composition of the Earth"
Chemical Geology 120, 223–253.

These data are averages for CI chondrites based on data of the previously publshed means and new data.

Figure 1. REE patterns for ordinary chondrites as well as carbonaceous chondrites normalized to a volatile-free basis


The Haskin et al. and Wakita et al. data were obtained by radiochemical neutron activation analysis. In this technique, relative uncertaities vary considerably from element to element. The Masuda et al. and Nakamura data were obtained by mass-spectrometric isotope dilution. In this technique, the relative uncertainties are more nearly the same for all elements. Note that data of Masuda et al. are based on analysis of a single meteorite, an LL chondrite. LL chondrites have high REE concentrations compared to H and L chondrites [see W&K (1988) data at the lower right of the figure]. For the Wasson and Kallemeyn [W&K 1988)] plot, means for H, L, and LL chondrites are plotted along with a grand mean (calculated by Korotev) weighted according to relative abundance of the 3 kinds of ordinary chondrites. The means of Taylor & McLennan and Boynton are based in part on data for carbonaceous chondrites that have been normalized to a volatile free basis.


Figure 2. REE patterns for (volatile-rich) CI chondrites


These patterns are based largely on literature data for CI chondrites but in some cases also data for ordinary chondrites normalized to a volatile-rich basis. The data of Wasson and Kallemeyn (1988) are the same as that of Anders & Ebihara (1982). Data for Y (yttrium) are plotted between that of Ho and Er. The horizontal line is defined by the A&G data.

 

Last revised:
16-Sep-2009